• DocumentCode
    2723414
  • Title

    Limitations of Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions

  • Author

    Dughmi, Shaddin ; Vondrak, Jan

  • Author_Institution
    Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    22-25 Oct. 2011
  • Firstpage
    502
  • Lastpage
    511
  • Abstract
    The design of computationally efficient and incentive compatible mechanisms that solve or approximate fundamental resource allocation problems is the main goal of algorithmic mechanism design. A central example in both theory and practice is welfare-maximization in combinatorial auctions. Recently, a randomized mechanism has been discovered for combinatorial auctions that is truthful in expectation and guarantees a (1-1/e)-approximation to the optimal social welfare when players have coverage valuations [11]. This approximation ratio is the best possible even for non-truthful algorithms, assuming P ≠ NP [16]. Given the recent sequence of negative results for combinatorial auctions under more restrictive notions of incentive compatibility, [7], [2], [9], this development raises a natural question: Are truthful-in-expectation mechanisms compatible with polynomial-time approximation in a way that deterministic or universally truthful mechanisms are not? In particular, can polynomial-time truthful-in-expectation mechanisms guarantee a near-optimal approximation ratio for more general variants of combinatorial auctions? We prove that this is not the case. Specifically, the result of [11] cannot be extended to combinatorial auctions with sub modular valuations in the value oracle model. (Absent strategic considerations, a (1-1/e)-approximation is still achievable in this setting [25].) More precisely, we prove that there is a constant γ >; 0 such that there is no randomized mechanism that is truthful-in-expectation-or even approximately truthful-in-expectation-and guarantees an m^{-gamma}-approximation to the optimal social welfare for combinatorial auctions with sub modular valuations in the value oracle model. We also prove an analogous result for the flexible combinatorial public projects (CPP) problem, where a truthful-in-expectation (1-1/e)-approximation for coverage valuations has been recently developed [11]. We show that there is no truthful-- n-expectation-or even approximately truthful-in-expectation-mechanism that achieves an m-approximation to the optimal social welfare for combinatorial public projects with sub modular valuations in the value oracle model. Both our results present an unexpected separation between coverage functions and sub modular functions, which does not occur for these problems without strategic considerations.
  • Keywords
    approximation theory; combinatorial mathematics; computational complexity; randomised algorithms; approximate fundamental resource allocation problems; combinatorial auctions; combinatorial public projects problem; optimal social welfare; polynomial-time approximation; randomized mechanisms; Approximation algorithms; Approximation methods; Cost accounting; Polynomials; Resource management; Tin; USA Councils; combinatorial auctions; mechanism design; submodular functions;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Palm Springs, CA
  • ISSN
    0272-5428
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-1843-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FOCS.2011.64
  • Filename
    6108211