DocumentCode
2731203
Title
Handling diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization
Author
Hallam, Nasreddine ; Blanchfield, Peter ; Kendall, Graham
Author_Institution
Malaysia Campus, Nottingham Univ., Malaysia
Volume
3
fYear
2005
fDate
2-5 Sept. 2005
Firstpage
2233
Abstract
In evolutionary multiobjective optimisation (EMO), the diversity of the set of non-dominated solutions used to be handled by the niching and fitness sharing technique. The main downside of this technique is the need to set the niche radius. Quite recently, new techniques have emerged and proved to be more successful. The grid-based density of the adaptive grid algorithm (AGA), the crowding-distance technique of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), and the archive truncation procedure of the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) are the latest successful methods that ensure a better diversity than the traditional less effective and computationally expensive niching method. In this work, a crowding-dispersion technique which is based on the Pareto potential regions (PPR), is proposed and compared to three recent techniques.
Keywords
Pareto optimisation; evolutionary computation; sorting; NSGA-II; Pareto potential regions; SPEA2; adaptive grid algorithm; archive truncation; crowding-distance technique; evolutionary multiobjective optimization; fitness sharing; grid-based density; niching method; nondominated sorting genetic algorithm; strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm; Cost function; Delta modulation; Design optimization; Evolutionary computation; Genetic algorithms; Grid computing; Optimization methods; Pareto optimization; Quality of service; Sorting;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Evolutionary Computation, 2005. The 2005 IEEE Congress on
Print_ISBN
0-7803-9363-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CEC.2005.1554972
Filename
1554972
Link To Document