Title :
Concurrent use of satellite imaging and passive acoustics for maritime domain awareness
Author :
Bruno, Michael ; Chung, Kil Woo ; Salloum, Hady ; Sedunov, Alexander ; Sedunov, Nikolay ; Sutin, Alexander ; Graber, Hans ; Mallas, Paul
Author_Institution :
Stevens Inst. of Technol., Hoboken, NJ, USA
Abstract :
The research being conducted in the Center for Secure and Resilient Maritime Commerce (CSR), a DHS National Center of Excellence for Port Security examines some basic science issues and emerging technologies to improve the security of ports and inland waterways, as well as coastal and offshore operations. This research follows a layered approach utilizing above water and underwater surveillance techniques. The investigated layers include satellite-based wide area surveillance; HF Radar systems providing over-the-horizon monitoring; and nearshore and harbor passive acoustic surveillance. Integration of these systems is aimed at achieving vessel detection, classification, identification, and tracking. In this paper, we present the results of sea tests where satellite imagery was combined with concurrent passive acoustic surveillance. The wide area sensing was provided by the University of Miami CSTARS facility´s electro-optical (EO) and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite imaging capabilities. Satellites detected the ships using a panchromatic EO sensor FormoSat-2 and SAR from the COSMO-SkyMed constellation. The Stevens Passive Acoustic System was used for detecting sound produced by the same ships that were detected by satellites. Concurrent Satellite - Acoustic measurements provide the following advantages: 1. Increasing the probability of small vessel detection and decreasing false alarms. 2. The joint systems can provide redundant detection and classification in conditions where one of the systems fails. For example, EO satellite imaging does not work at night and in fog and cloudy conditions while acoustic detection has limits during stormy weather due to ambient noise. SAR imaging can detect vessels in all weather, but provides less detail about a specific vessel. 3. Acoustics can provide target classification and bearing and satellites can give target localization and heading. SAR data can be used to estimate vessel speed in some cases. 4. Satellite imag- ng is helpful for the acoustic detection of an underwater target in cases when satellite information allows separation of surface and underwater targets. 5. Joint measurements provide more data (information) for target classification. Several tests were conducted in New York Harbor, where the satellite images and acoustic signatures of the same boats were recorded. The satellite registered a number of small boats. The small boats were acoustically detected at distances up to 4 km and the signal generated by a passenger ferry was observed at a distance up to 7 km.
Keywords :
military radar; optical radar; radar imaging; satellite tracking; synthetic aperture radar; target tracking; underwater acoustic communication; underwater vehicles; COSMO-SkyMed constellation; CSTARS facility´s electro-optical radar; Center for Secure and Resilient Maritime Commerce; DHS National Center of Excellence; FormoSat-2; HF radar systems; Miami University; New York Harbor; Stevens passive acoustic system; acoustic detection; acoustic surveillance; coastal operations; maritime domain awareness; offshore operations; panchromatic EO sensor; passive acoustics; port security; satellite imaging; synthetic aperture radar; target classification; underwater surveillance; vessel detection; Acoustics; Boats; Satellites; Security; Sonar equipment; Surveillance; Acoustic sensing; acoustic signature; maritime security; port security; satellite sensing;
Conference_Titel :
Waterside Security Conference (WSS), 2010 International
Conference_Location :
Carrara
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-8894-0
DOI :
10.1109/WSSC.2010.5730229