DocumentCode
2740935
Title
Benefits of collaboration and diversity in teams of categorically-thinking decision makers
Author
Joong Bum Rhim ; Varshney, Lav R. ; Goyal, Vivek K.
Author_Institution
Massachusetts Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, MA, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
17-20 June 2012
Firstpage
181
Lastpage
184
Abstract
Certain information-processing limitations in hypothesis testing can be modeled as quantization of prior probabilities. While quantization hurts performance, a team of decision makers can minimize their performance loss by adopting diverse quantizers and collaborating on the design of their decision rules. In this paper, the benefits of diversity and collaboration in binary hypothesis testing are discussed. A set of N diverse K-level quantizers used by a team of N collaborating decision makers is as powerful as a single (N(K - 1) + 1)-level quantizer used by them all. If the decision makers do not collaborate, a set of diverse quantizers is less powerful, but it is still better than a set of identical quantizers.
Keywords
decision making; quantisation (signal); N diverse K-level quantizers; binary hypothesis testing; categorically-thinking decision makers; decision maker collaboration; diverse quantizers; information-processing limitations; single (N(K-1)+1)-level quantizer; Collaboration; Conferences; Cost function; Decision making; Delta modulation; Quantization; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), 2012 IEEE 7th
Conference_Location
Hoboken, NJ
ISSN
1551-2282
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-1070-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/SAM.2012.6250461
Filename
6250461
Link To Document