DocumentCode
2750065
Title
Pulse train deinterleaving: algorithms and cost criteria
Author
Lee, Keith S M ; Rowe, Michael J. ; Krishnamurthy, Vikram
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Melbourne Univ., Parkville, Vic., Australia
Volume
5
fYear
1999
fDate
1999
Firstpage
2475
Abstract
Consider the problem where pulse trains transmitted from a known number of sources are received on a single communications channel. These pulses are corrupted with noise. The deinterleaving problem is to determine which source contributed which pulse and the periods and phases of each source. This paper explores the performance of a number of deinterleaving algorithms. We propose an alternative to the existing forward dynamic programming (FDP) technique: simulated annealing (SA). It can use either the same cost function as for FDP, or an L1 or L2 norm output error cost function. We also investigate modelling the noise by heavy-tailed distributions, in addition to white Gaussian noise (WGN)
Keywords
AWGN; error analysis; least squares approximations; signal processing; simulated annealing; AWGN; L1 norm output error cost function; L2 norm output error cost function; additive white Gaussian noise; communications channel; cost criteria; deinterleaving algorithms; forward dynamic programming; heavy-tailed distributions; least squares cost function; periods; phases; pulse train deinterleaving; pulse trains transmission; simulated annealing; sources; Additive white noise; Application software; Communication channels; Cost function; Dynamic programming; Gaussian noise; Phase estimation; Pulse measurements; Radar detection; Simulated annealing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1999. Proceedings., 1999 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Phoenix, AZ
ISSN
1520-6149
Print_ISBN
0-7803-5041-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICASSP.1999.760632
Filename
760632
Link To Document