DocumentCode
2764773
Title
Failed motors - rewind or replace?
Author
Campbell, Bruce H.
Author_Institution
Siemens Energy & Autom. Inc., Roswell, GA, USA
fYear
1996
fDate
10-14 June 1996
Firstpage
117
Lastpage
121
Abstract
For many process users, the issue of whether to replace a failed motor with a new energy efficient model or to repair the existing failed unit has not been easily resolved. Many companies have never developed firm guidelines or policies regarding the replace/repair issue; therefore, many failed motors are simply repaired, sometimes repeatedly, almost by default. Generally, the apparent cost to repair a failed motor (above approximately 15 hp) is less than that of a new motor. The Energy Act of 1992 does not address this issue-there are no efficiency guidelines which must be met with a repaired unit. This paper suggests that a more formal approach should be taken when making the repair/replace decision. The author argues that consideration should be given to many other factors in addition to the initial cost comparison.
Keywords
costing; economics; electric motors; energy conservation; maintenance engineering; cost; energy efficiency; failed motor; guidelines; policies; repair; replacement; rewinding; Automation; Core loss; Costs; Energy efficiency; Energy management; Guidelines; History; Marketing and sales; Potential energy; Stator cores;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, 1996., Conference Record of 1996 Annual
Conference_Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
ISSN
0190-2172
Print_ISBN
0-7803-3148-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PAPCON.1996.535988
Filename
535988
Link To Document