• DocumentCode
    2764773
  • Title

    Failed motors - rewind or replace?

  • Author

    Campbell, Bruce H.

  • Author_Institution
    Siemens Energy & Autom. Inc., Roswell, GA, USA
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    10-14 June 1996
  • Firstpage
    117
  • Lastpage
    121
  • Abstract
    For many process users, the issue of whether to replace a failed motor with a new energy efficient model or to repair the existing failed unit has not been easily resolved. Many companies have never developed firm guidelines or policies regarding the replace/repair issue; therefore, many failed motors are simply repaired, sometimes repeatedly, almost by default. Generally, the apparent cost to repair a failed motor (above approximately 15 hp) is less than that of a new motor. The Energy Act of 1992 does not address this issue-there are no efficiency guidelines which must be met with a repaired unit. This paper suggests that a more formal approach should be taken when making the repair/replace decision. The author argues that consideration should be given to many other factors in addition to the initial cost comparison.
  • Keywords
    costing; economics; electric motors; energy conservation; maintenance engineering; cost; energy efficiency; failed motor; guidelines; policies; repair; replacement; rewinding; Automation; Core loss; Costs; Energy efficiency; Energy management; Guidelines; History; Marketing and sales; Potential energy; Stator cores;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, 1996., Conference Record of 1996 Annual
  • Conference_Location
    Birmingham, AL, USA
  • ISSN
    0190-2172
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3148-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PAPCON.1996.535988
  • Filename
    535988