DocumentCode
2790122
Title
The ameliorating effects of accountability on automation bias
Author
Burdick, Mark D. ; Skitka, Linda J. ; Mosier, Kathleen L. ; Heers, Susan
Author_Institution
Illinois Univ., Chicago, IL, USA
fYear
1996
fDate
25-28 Aug 1996
Firstpage
142
Abstract
Recent research indicates that automated decision aids introduced into the workplace with the express purpose of reducing human error may have the paradoxical effect of simply changing the types of errors made. This series of studies documents a possible “automation bias” and uses the concept of social accountability as a “debiasing” intervention with two sample populations. Results indicate that subjects who perceived themselves as accountable for their accuracy or performance were significantly less likely to fall victim to automation bias in a simulated cockpit environment
Keywords
aerospace expert systems; decision support systems; human factors; man-machine systems; accountability; automated decision aids; automation bias; debiasing intervention; simulated cockpit environment; social accountability; Aerospace simulation; Automation; Biological system modeling; Costs; Employment; Humans; Information processing; Multidimensional systems; NASA; Psychology;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Human Interaction with Complex Systems, 1996. HICS '96. Proceedings., Third Annual Symposium on
Conference_Location
Dayton, OH
Print_ISBN
0-8186-7493-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/HUICS.1996.549504
Filename
549504
Link To Document