• DocumentCode
    2790122
  • Title

    The ameliorating effects of accountability on automation bias

  • Author

    Burdick, Mark D. ; Skitka, Linda J. ; Mosier, Kathleen L. ; Heers, Susan

  • Author_Institution
    Illinois Univ., Chicago, IL, USA
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    25-28 Aug 1996
  • Firstpage
    142
  • Abstract
    Recent research indicates that automated decision aids introduced into the workplace with the express purpose of reducing human error may have the paradoxical effect of simply changing the types of errors made. This series of studies documents a possible “automation bias” and uses the concept of social accountability as a “debiasing” intervention with two sample populations. Results indicate that subjects who perceived themselves as accountable for their accuracy or performance were significantly less likely to fall victim to automation bias in a simulated cockpit environment
  • Keywords
    aerospace expert systems; decision support systems; human factors; man-machine systems; accountability; automated decision aids; automation bias; debiasing intervention; simulated cockpit environment; social accountability; Aerospace simulation; Automation; Biological system modeling; Costs; Employment; Humans; Information processing; Multidimensional systems; NASA; Psychology;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Human Interaction with Complex Systems, 1996. HICS '96. Proceedings., Third Annual Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Dayton, OH
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-7493-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/HUICS.1996.549504
  • Filename
    549504