• DocumentCode
    279403
  • Title

    Simulation versus reality-measurement of target range and angle

  • Author

    Ausfresser, H.D. ; Iny, D.R.

  • Author_Institution
    Westinghouse Electr. Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    12-13 Oct 1992
  • Firstpage
    18
  • Lastpage
    21
  • Abstract
    The W-160 naval fire control radar described includes advanced measurement algorithms which minimize the RMS range and angle tracking errors by minimizing the effects of bias errors. These W-160 algorithms have been separately shown to be asymptotically unbiased as the number of samples increases. Under the conditions simulated, for the 5 dB SNR case and a tracker improvement factor of five, results indicate that the W-160 split gate algorithm produced an RMS angle error which is four times lower than the Kanter algorithm. Under these same conditions the W-160 split gate algorithm produced an RMS range error which is six times lower than the classical algorithm to which it was compared. The performance of a second set of W-160 algorithms, the central gate algorithms, is also presented. It is shown that, as expected, the central gate algorithms provide better angle measurements at the expense of poorer range measurements
  • Keywords
    military equipment; radar systems; signal processing; spatial variables measurement; RMS angle error; RMS range error; W-160 naval fire control radar; W-160 split gate algorithm; angle tracking errors; bias errors; central gate algorithms; military radar; range measurements; target angle measurement; target range;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    iet
  • Conference_Titel
    Radar 92. International Conference
  • Conference_Location
    Brighton
  • Print_ISBN
    0-85296-553-2
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    187033