DocumentCode
2809546
Title
A quantitative comparison of three methods for inflating cortical meshes
Author
Bonner, Erik ; Acosta, Oscar ; Fripp, Jurgen ; Salvado, Olivier
Author_Institution
Preventative Health Nat. Res. Flagship, Australian e-Health Res. Centre - BioMedIA, CSIRO, Herston, QLD, Australia
fYear
2009
fDate
June 28 2009-July 1 2009
Firstpage
1338
Lastpage
1341
Abstract
Polygon meshes representing the cerebral cortex have been increasingly used for visualisation and analysis in biomedical imaging in recent years. Due to the highly convoluted structure of the cerebral cortex, a number of methods have been proposed for inflating cortical meshes to expose information buried in sulci and simplify the surface for further computation. Such inflations necessarily introduce geometric metric distortions to the surface. In this paper we present a quantitative comparison of three methods for inflating cortical surfaces: CARET, FreeSurfer and Diffusion-based Deformation. The methods were evaluated by how well they preserved a set of surface metrics, as well as their computational efficiency. We show that CARET is best for area preservation, while FreeSurfer performs best with respect to angular distortion and computational efficiency.
Keywords
biology computing; brain; medical image processing; CARET; FreeSurfer; cerebral cortex; cortical mesh inflation; diffusion-based deformation; polygon meshes; sulci; Australia; Biomedical imaging; Cerebral cortex; Computational efficiency; Geometry; Image analysis; Neuroimaging; Shape; Surface reconstruction; Visualization; CARET; Comparison; Cortical surface inflation; FreeSurfer; Metric distortion;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI '09. IEEE International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Boston, MA
ISSN
1945-7928
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-3931-7
Electronic_ISBN
1945-7928
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193312
Filename
5193312
Link To Document