DocumentCode
2854688
Title
Executive directors´ remuneration after fraud and lawsuits revelation
Author
Majdi, Suria ; Rahman, Rashidah Abdul
Author_Institution
Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia
fYear
2010
fDate
18-20 June 2010
Firstpage
229
Lastpage
233
Abstract
The study uses 136 firms, comprising of 68 fraud and lawsuit firms in Malaysia that experienced fraud and lawsuit revelation over the period 2001 to 2006 and 68 non-fraud and non-lawsuit firms. The results show that fraud and lawsuit firms reduced the executives´ remuneration by 6% in the 2nd year after the fraud and lawsuit revelation while non-fraud and non-lawsuit firms still increased the executives´ remuneration by 8.08% during the same period. The results indicate that fraud and lawsuit firms reduce their executives´ remuneration to improve the firm´s performance and also to discipline the executive directors´ behaviour after the fraud year so that they do not deviate from the shareholders´ wealth maximizing policy. Further, this study also found that fraud and lawsuit revelation enhanced further the monitoring role of the independent directors in fraud and lawsuit firms.
Keywords
Board of Directors; Costs; Hydrogen; Monitoring; Remuneration; executive directors´ remuneration; fraud and lawsuit; internal monitoring mechanisms;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Financial Theory and Engineering (ICFTE), 2010 International Conference on
Conference_Location
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-7757-9
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-7759-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICFTE.2010.5499391
Filename
5499391
Link To Document