DocumentCode
2867669
Title
Comparison of Analytical and Artificial Intelligent Models for Quality Assurance in Micro-milling Operations
Author
Kitazawa, Guillermo ; Siller, Héctor R. ; Abellan-Nebot, J.V.
Author_Institution
Centre for Innovation in Design & Technol., Tecnol. de Monterrey (ITESM), Monterrey, Mexico
fYear
2011
fDate
Nov. 26 2011-Dec. 4 2011
Firstpage
88
Lastpage
93
Abstract
Despite the high performance of artificial intelligent (AI) models for part quality prediction and control in machining operations, only well-known analytical models are commonly used in industry. This paper compares different analytical models with AI models for quality assurance in the fabrication of fluidic channels in micro-milling operations. The comparison of both types of models is conducted in terms of accuracy, ability for optimizing the operation ensuring part quality, and prediction robustness from environmental changes. The results show the main differences between these two types of models and reflect their advantages and drawbacks according to the analyzed application.
Keywords
artificial intelligence; microfluidics; micromachining; micromechanical devices; milling; production engineering computing; quality assurance; quality control; MEMS industry; analytical model; artificial intelligent model; environmental change prediction robustness; machining operation; microfluidic channel fabrication; micromilling operation; model accuracy; operation optimization ability; part quality control; part quality prediction; quality assurance; Accuracy; Analytical models; Artificial neural networks; Predictive models; Rough surfaces; Surface roughness; Analytical Models; Artificial Neural Networks; Genetic Algorithms; Micro-milling; Part Quality;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Artificial Intelligence (MICAI), 2011 10th Mexican International Conference on
Conference_Location
Puebla
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-2173-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/MICAI.2011.34
Filename
6119008
Link To Document