DocumentCode
2870056
Title
Notice of Retraction
A comparison of two combustor modeling approaches for real time turbofan engine model
Author
Kong Xiangxing ; Wang Xi
Author_Institution
Dept. of Aviation Propulsion, Beijing Univ. of Aeronaut. & Astronaut., BUAA, Beijing, China
Volume
9
fYear
2010
fDate
22-24 Oct. 2010
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
This paper presents two combustor modeling approaches for real time turbofan engine model. The two approaches are called Integral Approach and Hybrid Approach. Integral Approach resorts to the effect of mass and energy storage in a volume to establish the pressure and temperature differential equations. Whereas Hybrid Approach considers only the effect of mass storage in a volume to achieve pressure differential equation, and the temperature is solved through a local iterative. Furthermore, simulation is carried out on both set-point and transient conditions. The results show both the two models fairly well match the experiment data. Ultimately, comparisons of the two models in terms of their efficiency and precision are presented.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
This paper presents two combustor modeling approaches for real time turbofan engine model. The two approaches are called Integral Approach and Hybrid Approach. Integral Approach resorts to the effect of mass and energy storage in a volume to establish the pressure and temperature differential equations. Whereas Hybrid Approach considers only the effect of mass storage in a volume to achieve pressure differential equation, and the temperature is solved through a local iterative. Furthermore, simulation is carried out on both set-point and transient conditions. The results show both the two models fairly well match the experiment data. Ultimately, comparisons of the two models in terms of their efficiency and precision are presented.
Keywords
combustion; control system synthesis; differential equations; iterative methods; jet engines; combustor modeling approach; energy storage; hybrid approach; integral approach; pressure differential equation; real time turbofan engine model; temperature differential equation; Computational modeling; Equations; Iterative methods; Mathematical model; Numerical models; Simulation; Transient analysis; combustor; real time model; turbofan engine; volume effect;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), 2010 International Conference on
Conference_Location
Taiyuan
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-7235-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICCASM.2010.5622963
Filename
5622963
Link To Document