• DocumentCode
    2871960
  • Title

    COTS: the expensive solution?

  • Author

    McDermid, John A.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., York Univ., UK
  • fYear
    1997
  • fDate
    35458
  • Firstpage
    42370
  • Lastpage
    42373
  • Abstract
    The use of COTS (commercial off-the-shelf software) is not the panacea sometimes implied by procurers. Indeed, for safety-critical systems (SCS), it may increase costs rather than decrease them. This may be true even in the production phase of system procurement, and the risks of the support phase may outweigh any benefits gained in initial purchase costs. However, the use of COTS in SCS should neither be accepted nor rejected out of hand. Instead any proposed use of COTS in an SCS project should involve at least: (a) a cost and risk analysis, to show that there are likely to be economic benefits, and that the identified risks can be mitigated and are tolerable; and (b) the early production of a draft safety case, to be “bought off” with the procurement or certification agency, showing that there is an acceptable approach to certifying the COTS-as well as other software. These actions will not guarantee an economical or risk-free project, but they should counterbalance the frequently encountered and naive view that the use of COTS is necessarily cheaper-even in SCS
  • Keywords
    safety-critical software; certification agency; commercial off-the-shelf software; cost increases; cost-benefit analysis; draft safety case; expensive solution; production phase; purchase costs; risk analysis; safety-critical systems; support phase; system procurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    iet
  • Conference_Titel
    Cots and Safety Critical Systems (Digest No. 1997/013), IEE Colloquium on
  • Conference_Location
    London
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1049/ic:19970091
  • Filename
    599240