• DocumentCode
    2874372
  • Title

    Classification Performance Comparison between RVM and SVM

  • Author

    Xiang-min, Xu ; Yun-Feng, Mao ; Jia-Ni, Xiong ; Feng-le, Zhou

  • Author_Institution
    Electron. & Inf. Dept., SCUT, Guangzhou
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    16-18 April 2007
  • Firstpage
    208
  • Lastpage
    211
  • Abstract
    Both relevant vector machine and support vector machine are newly promoted pattern recognition algorithms. An extensive relevant literature displays that they have become hot topics in the field of machine learning. Due to the difference of their mechanism, little research is done to compare their performance. This paper experimentally compared several features of RVM with SVM which can characterize the classification performance on the basis of deeply understanding their algorithms. The results show that RVM is almost equal to SVM on training efficiency and classification accuracy, but as to sparse property, generalization ability and decision speed, RVM performs better. So it is recommended to study RVM deeply and extend its application areas further.
  • Keywords
    pattern recognition; support vector machines; RVM; SVM; classification performance comparison; pattern recognition algorithms; relevant vector machine; support vector machine; Bayesian methods; Face recognition; Kernel; Machine learning; Machine learning algorithms; Pattern recognition; Risk management; Statistical learning; Support vector machine classification; Support vector machines; Bayesian learning; RVM; SVM; machine learning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Anti-counterfeiting, Security, Identification, 2007 IEEE International Workshop on
  • Conference_Location
    Xiamen, Fujian
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-1035-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1-4244-1035-5
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IWASID.2007.373728
  • Filename
    4244814