DocumentCode
2883191
Title
Heart sound analysis comparing wavelet and autoregressive techniques
Author
Torry, J.N.
Author_Institution
Sussex Univ., Brighton, UK
fYear
2003
fDate
21-24 Sept. 2003
Firstpage
657
Lastpage
660
Abstract
Three different types of wavelets (Morlet, Bessel filter and Chirp) and four different types of autoregressive modelling techniques (Burg, forward, backward and modified covariance) are considered. A straightforward algorithm is suggested for all wavelet calculations. A modification is made to the standard autoregressive technique to reduce the dominance of certain peaks. The heart sounds of a set of normal patients and on a set of patients diagnosed as having aortic stenosis are investigated. After separating the sound into individual heart cycle and further separating into the four phases (S1, systolic, S2 and diastolic), the relative energy levels in different phases over a number of cycles are compared. Typical results are selected for individual cycles and show the benefit of the modified autoregressive approach.
Keywords
acoustic signal processing; autoregressive processes; bioacoustics; cardiology; covariance analysis; filtering theory; medical signal processing; wavelet transforms; Bessel filter; Burg covariance; Morlet wavelet; S1 phase; S2 phase; aortic stenosis; autoregressive techniques; backward covariance; chirp wavelet; diastolic phase; forward covariance; heart cycle; heart sound analysis; modified covariance; systolic phase; Cardiology; Computer displays; Computer languages; Electrocardiography; Filters; Heart; Hospitals; Portable computers; Signal processing algorithms; Wavelet analysis;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computers in Cardiology, 2003
ISSN
0276-6547
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8170-X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CIC.2003.1291241
Filename
1291241
Link To Document