DocumentCode
2895666
Title
When is a satellite not a toaster? [satellite repair costs]
Author
Feuchter, Christopher A. ; Van Meter, Charles A. ; Neuman, Kurt M. ; Sparrow, Kalla J.
Author_Institution
Office of Aerosp. Studies, Kirtland AFB, NM, USA
fYear
1991
fDate
8-11 Dec 1991
Firstpage
499
Lastpage
508
Abstract
It is pointed out that automobiles are typically repaired, but inexpensive appliances are discarded at the first sign of trouble: they `cost too much to fix.´ Comparing $50 M satellites with toasters may seem odd, but the analogy can be appropriate. It is suggested that the too-much-to-fix argument can be used in deciding whether to replace or to repair satellites. The authors investigate when cost considerations dictate using constellations of expendable satellites to be routinely replaced and discarded on failure, and when circumstances indicate using constellations of satellites to be repaired on-orbit by exchanging failed modules
Keywords
artificial satellites; economics; maintenance engineering; reliability; COMA; cost considerations; expendable satellites; on-orbit repairs; satellite failed modules exchange; satellite repair costs; Automobiles; Availability; Cost function; Earth; Home appliances; NASA; Observatories; Satellite constellations; Space shuttles; Telescopes;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Simulation Conference, 1991. Proceedings., Winter
Conference_Location
Phoenix, AZ
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0181-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/WSC.1991.185652
Filename
185652
Link To Document