DocumentCode :
2895666
Title :
When is a satellite not a toaster? [satellite repair costs]
Author :
Feuchter, Christopher A. ; Van Meter, Charles A. ; Neuman, Kurt M. ; Sparrow, Kalla J.
Author_Institution :
Office of Aerosp. Studies, Kirtland AFB, NM, USA
fYear :
1991
fDate :
8-11 Dec 1991
Firstpage :
499
Lastpage :
508
Abstract :
It is pointed out that automobiles are typically repaired, but inexpensive appliances are discarded at the first sign of trouble: they `cost too much to fix.´ Comparing $50 M satellites with toasters may seem odd, but the analogy can be appropriate. It is suggested that the too-much-to-fix argument can be used in deciding whether to replace or to repair satellites. The authors investigate when cost considerations dictate using constellations of expendable satellites to be routinely replaced and discarded on failure, and when circumstances indicate using constellations of satellites to be repaired on-orbit by exchanging failed modules
Keywords :
artificial satellites; economics; maintenance engineering; reliability; COMA; cost considerations; expendable satellites; on-orbit repairs; satellite failed modules exchange; satellite repair costs; Automobiles; Availability; Cost function; Earth; Home appliances; NASA; Observatories; Satellite constellations; Space shuttles; Telescopes;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Simulation Conference, 1991. Proceedings., Winter
Conference_Location :
Phoenix, AZ
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-0181-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/WSC.1991.185652
Filename :
185652
Link To Document :
بازگشت