DocumentCode
2905104
Title
Flow estimation using subharmonics of microbubbles
Author
Lo, Mentzung ; Tsai, Dung-Han ; Tsao, Jenho
Author_Institution
Graduate Inst. of Commun. Eng., Nat. Taiwan Univ., Taipei, Taiwan
Volume
2
fYear
2003
fDate
5-8 Oct. 2003
Firstpage
1187
Abstract
It has been observed that the subharmonic signal of the microbubbles has a significant contrast-to-tissue ratio. The flow velocity can be evaluated precisely even without wall filter for subharmonics since the vessels containing the microbubbles would be distinguishable from the surrounding tissues. However, the microbubble cannot generate the subharmonics unless the applied pressure exceeds the required onset threshold. Moreover, it will undergo cavitation if the acoustic pressure is over the cavitation threshold. While the microbubble moves through the sample volume, there are three different regions inside the excitation beam. The beam-weighted pressure is below the onset threshold, between the onset and cavitation thresholds, and over the cavitation threshold. Since the subharmonics can occur only when the beam-weighted pressure is between the onset and cavitation thresholds, the observation time for subharmonics is shorter than that for the fundamental. Our numerical results showed that the onset threshold is very close to the cavitation threshold. Moreover, some microbubbles are found to generate subharmonics and undergo cavitation simultaneously. Our mathematical analysis showed that the consecutive received signals would have very low correlation for the subharmonics. The experimental data from the Levovist® suspension were used to verify the theoretical predictions. It can be shown that the absolute value of the normalized autocorrelation (first lag) of Doppler signals for the subharmonics was much smaller than the fundamental and the second harmonics when the emitted frequency is 2.1 MHz and the acoustic pressure is 0.8 Mpa. In addition, it is found that the correlation value is always below 0.3 when the emitted frequency is swept from 1.5 to 2.5 MHz and the applied pressure is varied from 0.1 to 1.6 Mpa.
Keywords
Doppler measurement; acoustic wave velocity measurement; bubbles; harmonic analysis; 0.1 to 1.6 MPa; 0.8 MPa; 1.5 to 2.5 MHz; 2.1 MHz; Doppler power spectrum bandwidth; Doppler signals; Levovist® suspension; acoustic pressure; autocorrelation; beam-weighted pressure; cavitation threshold; contrast-to-tissue ratio; excitation beam; flow estimation; flow velocity; microbubble subharmonics; subharmonic signal; wall filter; Acoustic beams; Acoustic emission; Autocorrelation; Bandwidth; Frequency; Harmonic analysis; Mathematical analysis; Power harmonic filters; RF signals; Signal analysis;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Ultrasonics, 2003 IEEE Symposium on
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7922-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ULTSYM.2003.1293113
Filename
1293113
Link To Document