DocumentCode
2913852
Title
On Spectrum Probing in Cognitive Radio Networks: Does Randomization Matter?
Author
Chen, Chao ; Chen, Zesheng ; Cooklev, Todor ; Pomalaza-Raez, Carlos
Author_Institution
Indiana Univ. - Purdue Univ., Fort Wayne, IN, USA
fYear
2010
fDate
23-27 May 2010
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
In cognitive radio networks, dynamic spectrum access is achieved by allowing secondary users (SUs) to probe the spectrum and utilize available channels opportunistically. Spectrum probing mechanisms should be efficient and fast to avoid harmful interference with primary users (PUs). Periodic probing has been commonly adopted as a default spectrum probing mechanism. In this paper, we attempt to study different spectrum probing mechanisms and evaluate a performance metric called the probing delay, i.e., how quickly a probing mechanism can detect a channel change. We find that randomization in the probing strategy does affect the probing delay. Specifically, in the independent sensing scenario, periodic probing indeed achieves the smallest probing delay. In the cooperative sensing scenario, however, randomization can drastically reduce the probing delay.
Keywords
cognitive radio; radiofrequency interference; spread spectrum communication; wireless channels; cognitive radio networks; dynamic spectrum access; interference avoidance; performance metric; primary users; probing delay; secondary users; spectrum probing mechanisms; Channel allocation; Chaotic communication; Cognitive radio; Communications Society; Delay; Interference; Measurement; Monitoring; Probes; Signal detection;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Communications (ICC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Cape Town
ISSN
1550-3607
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-6402-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICC.2010.5502698
Filename
5502698
Link To Document