• DocumentCode
    2913852
  • Title

    On Spectrum Probing in Cognitive Radio Networks: Does Randomization Matter?

  • Author

    Chen, Chao ; Chen, Zesheng ; Cooklev, Todor ; Pomalaza-Raez, Carlos

  • Author_Institution
    Indiana Univ. - Purdue Univ., Fort Wayne, IN, USA
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    23-27 May 2010
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    In cognitive radio networks, dynamic spectrum access is achieved by allowing secondary users (SUs) to probe the spectrum and utilize available channels opportunistically. Spectrum probing mechanisms should be efficient and fast to avoid harmful interference with primary users (PUs). Periodic probing has been commonly adopted as a default spectrum probing mechanism. In this paper, we attempt to study different spectrum probing mechanisms and evaluate a performance metric called the probing delay, i.e., how quickly a probing mechanism can detect a channel change. We find that randomization in the probing strategy does affect the probing delay. Specifically, in the independent sensing scenario, periodic probing indeed achieves the smallest probing delay. In the cooperative sensing scenario, however, randomization can drastically reduce the probing delay.
  • Keywords
    cognitive radio; radiofrequency interference; spread spectrum communication; wireless channels; cognitive radio networks; dynamic spectrum access; interference avoidance; performance metric; primary users; probing delay; secondary users; spectrum probing mechanisms; Channel allocation; Chaotic communication; Cognitive radio; Communications Society; Delay; Interference; Measurement; Monitoring; Probes; Signal detection;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Communications (ICC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Cape Town
  • ISSN
    1550-3607
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-6402-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICC.2010.5502698
  • Filename
    5502698