DocumentCode :
2915909
Title :
Slideware: Text or visuals?
Author :
Vanbaelen, Ruth ; Harrison, Jonathan
fYear :
2012
fDate :
8-10 Oct. 2012
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
3
Abstract :
This Work in Progress discusses the literature evaluating the use of slideware in the classroom, student benefits and retention rates. The focus is on how the literature addresses the following issues: 1. Presentation gurus argue that slides high on visual content and low on text appeal to audiences. Research argues that students learn better from text and pictures than text alone. However, is visual content sufficient for long-term retention if the accompanying narration is not recorded, i.e. via note-taking, during class? 2. Research indicates that multimedia use occasionally leads to redundancy due to the coexistence of graphics, text and narration. Accordingly, material needs to be evaluated in terms of the combination of graphics, text and narration in order to lower the cognitive load for the students. 3. Graphics are advocated as tools to increase appeal. For educators whose goals are learning and content retention, can and should content be presented visually rather than textually? This paper discusses how the literature evaluates the suitability of both mediums to transmit information to an audience in an academic setting.
Keywords :
computer aided instruction; computer graphics; multimedia computing; academic setting; cognitive load; graphics; multimedia use; note-taking; retention rates; slideware; student benefits; visual content; Educational institutions; Materials; Multimedia communication; Redundancy; Visualization; Graphics vs. text; learner benefits and retention; slideware;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2012 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Orlando, FL
ISSN :
2158-091X
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4577-2124-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IPCC.2012.6408603
Filename :
6408603
Link To Document :
بازگشت