Title :
Inductive vs. transductive clustering using kernel functions and pairwise constraints
Author :
Miyamoto, S. ; Terami, A.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Risk Eng., Univ. of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Abstract :
In parallel with the inductive and transductive learning, we introduce the concepts of inductive and transductive clustering: when the result of clustering induces a function for classification on the entire space of interest, the method is called that of inductive clustering, whereas a method does not induce such a function, it is called transductive. Typical examples in the former class are crisp and fuzzy c-means, while one of the latter is agglomerative hierarchical clustering. These two concepts are clearly contrasted when kernel functions are employed. We show differences of the two classes of methods of clustering, in particular the latter class has what we call explicit mappings for kernel functions, while the former does not. Moreover pairwise constraints are considered for two methods, one from each class, and investigate effects of the constraints by typical examples.
Keywords :
fuzzy set theory; learning (artificial intelligence); pattern classification; pattern clustering; agglomerative hierarchical clustering; crisp c-means algorithm; fuzzy c-means algorithm; inductive clustering; inductive learning; kernel function; pairwise constraint; transductive clustering; transductive learning; Algorithm design and analysis; Clustering algorithms; Couplings; Euclidean distance; Intelligent systems; Kernel; Resource management; cluster analysis; induction; kernel function; pairwise constraints; transduction;
Conference_Titel :
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 2011 11th International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Cordoba
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4577-1676-8
DOI :
10.1109/ISDA.2011.6121832