DocumentCode :
2920105
Title :
Are departments obsolete? [education]
Author :
Olds, Barbara M. ; Miller, Ronald L.
Author_Institution :
Colorado Sch. of Mines, Golden, CO, USA
fYear :
1991
fDate :
21-24 Sep 1991
Firstpage :
213
Lastpage :
217
Abstract :
The authors note that so much of the work they are presently engaged in at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) is interdisciplinary that they are asking themselves whether the `major´ as it has evolved over the past few decades is really the best way to package undergraduate engineering education. Based on recent experiences, they have begun to conclude that specialization may be better pursued at the graduate rather than the undergraduate level and that undergraduate engineering students may do just as well, if not better, with a broad-based general degree than with a specialized one. If this is true, the typical engineering departmental structure may be obsolete. It is pointed out that a number of institutions, engineering schools, and individual departments are already recognizing the kinds of problems with which the authors are concerned and are developing innovative solutions. The authors discuss various models at the institutional, departmental, and programmatic levels which support their contention that the existing departmental structure is obsolete
Keywords :
education; engineering; CSM; Colorado School of Mines; departmental levels; institutional levels; programmatic levels; students; undergraduate engineering education; Arm; Art; Design engineering; Engineering education; Engineering profession; Hardware; Information security; Jamming; Knowledge engineering; Stress;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Frontiers in Education Conference, 1991. Twenty-First Annual Conference. 'Engineering Education in a New World Order.' Proceedings.
Conference_Location :
West Lafayette, IN
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-0222-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/FIE.1991.187473
Filename :
187473
Link To Document :
بازگشت