• DocumentCode
    2969873
  • Title

    Usability and functionality: A comparison of project managers´ and potential users´ evaluations

  • Author

    Bayraktaroglu, A.E. ; Calisir, F. ; Gumussoy, C.A.

  • Author_Institution
    Ind. Eng. Dept., Istanbul Tech. Univ., Macka, Turkey
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    8-11 Dec. 2009
  • Firstpage
    2019
  • Lastpage
    2023
  • Abstract
    Users tend to use functional and usable products more frequently. It is also possible that a functional software is not usable or vice versa. Only functionality-focused designs fail to meet usability needs. Therefore, both usability and functionality, which in software design are interrelated, should be taken into account in the design processes. In addition, meeting users´ requirements is one of predictors of project success. Therefore, there should be a match between the expectations of the users and the perception of the project managers with respect to usability and functionality. The aim of this study is to make a comparison of the project managers´ and potential users´ evaluations of the relative importance of usability and functionality factors in a software design project. Analytical Network Process (ANP) was used to analyze the relative importance of the factors.
  • Keywords
    project management; software management; software reusability; user centred design; analytical network process; design processes; functional products; functional software; functionality-focused designs; project management; project managers; software design project; usability needs; usable products; user evaluations; user requirements; Engineering management; Industrial engineering; Navigation; Project management; Risk management; Software design; Software packages; Software performance; Usability; User centered design; Functionality; software design; usability;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009. IEEM 2009. IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Hong Kong
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4869-2
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4870-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373206
  • Filename
    5373206