DocumentCode
2975356
Title
MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?
Author
Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim
Author_Institution
Raytheon, Woburn, MA
fYear
2009
fDate
8-13 Feb. 2009
Firstpage
113
Lastpage
117
Abstract
MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional comm. under certain conditions, and MIMO comm. also appears to be practical and cost effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI & ECM & multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious tradeoffs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity and risk, considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler less expensive and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
Keywords
MIMO communication; phased array radar; MIMO communication; MIMO radar; multiple input multiple output; phased array radar; snake oil; system complexity; Costs; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Waveform Diversity and Design Conference, 2009 International
Conference_Location
Kissimmee, FL
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-2970-7
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-2971-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/WDDC.2009.4800326
Filename
4800326
Link To Document