• DocumentCode
    2975356
  • Title

    MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?

  • Author

    Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim

  • Author_Institution
    Raytheon, Woburn, MA
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    8-13 Feb. 2009
  • Firstpage
    113
  • Lastpage
    117
  • Abstract
    MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional comm. under certain conditions, and MIMO comm. also appears to be practical and cost effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI & ECM & multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious tradeoffs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity and risk, considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler less expensive and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
  • Keywords
    MIMO communication; phased array radar; MIMO communication; MIMO radar; multiple input multiple output; phased array radar; snake oil; system complexity; Costs; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Waveform Diversity and Design Conference, 2009 International
  • Conference_Location
    Kissimmee, FL
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2970-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2971-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/WDDC.2009.4800326
  • Filename
    4800326