• DocumentCode
    2987995
  • Title

    Impulse noise removal: Noise detection versus pixel estimation

  • Author

    Dang, Dung ; Luo, Wenbin

  • Author_Institution
    Engineering Department, St. Mary´s University, One Camino Santa Maria, San Antonio, TX 78228-8534, USA
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    7-9 April 2006
  • Firstpage
    120
  • Lastpage
    124
  • Abstract
    This paper proposes a new finding regarding the different roles and significance of noise detection and pixel estimation utilized in the majority of impulse noise removing algorithms. Extensive experimental results will be presented to show that the importance of each method depends on the noise ratio. In other words, by particularly examining how the adaptive median filter (AMF) algorithm [18] employs the two aforementioned methods in comparison with their modified versions as well as the ideal-filtering algorithm, this paper will point out the role that each method plays. The significance of noise detection can be realized at low noise ratio while pixel estimation gains its efficiency as noise ratio increases.
  • Keywords
    Adaptive filters; Communication channels; Digital images; Image restoration; Image segmentation; Image sensors; Noise level; Object recognition; Pixel; Signal to noise ratio;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Region 5 Conference, 2006 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    San Antonio, TX, USA
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0358-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0359-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TPSD.2006.5507445
  • Filename
    5507445