DocumentCode
2997605
Title
GSSA and ACO for assembly sequence planning: A comparative study
Author
Shu-xia, Li ; Hong-bo, Shan
Author_Institution
Sch. of Bus., East China Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Shanghai
fYear
2008
fDate
1-3 Sept. 2008
Firstpage
1270
Lastpage
1275
Abstract
Assembly sequence planning (ASP) is a crucial design step in the product development process which plays an important role in the fields of CAD/CAM design issues, the cost of assembly/manufacturing, as well as the selection of equipment. Whereas, ASP is an extremely diverse, large scale and highly constrained combinatorial problem, and it is difficult to find an optimal/near-optimal solution in an acceptable time. Numerous researchers have employed soft computing methods such as genetic algorithms (GA) and simulated annealing (SA) algorithms to go towards the assembly sequence features of speed and flexibility. As regards the large constraint assembly problems, however, traditional GAs depend on the initial sequence heavily, which results in the premature convergence in iterative operations. As for SA algorithms, it may generate a great deal of infeasible solutions in the evolution process by generating new sequences through exchanging position of the randomly selected two parts, which results in inefficiency of the solution-searching process. Considering the limitations above, two heuristics algorithms for ASP are presented. The proposed novel method under the name of genetic simulated annealing algorithm (GSAA) and ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm for ASP is possessed of the competence for assisting the planner in generating a satisfied and effective assembly sequence with respect to large constraint assembly perplexity. Furthermore, the GSAA and ACO are applied in a vice ASP, the results of which are compared in respect of the quality of solution and the efficiency of searching process. At last, the advantages and disadvantages of GSAA and ACO are pointed out by comparison, which gives some useful hint on future research.
Keywords
CAD/CAM; assembly planning; genetic algorithms; product development; simulated annealing; CAD/CAM design; ant colony optimization algorithm; assembly sequence planning; assembly/manufacturing; constrained combinatorial problem; genetic simulated annealing algorithm; heuristics algorithm; product development process; soft computing method; Application specific processors; Assembly; CADCAM; Computer aided manufacturing; Costs; Design automation; Iterative algorithms; Process planning; Product development; Simulated annealing; Ant colony optimization; Assembly sequence planning; Genetic simulated annealing algorithm;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Automation and Logistics, 2008. ICAL 2008. IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Qingdao
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-2502-0
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-2503-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICAL.2008.4636347
Filename
4636347
Link To Document