Knowledge rules development for diagnostics outcomes in GIS

Author

Al-Suhaily, Muhannad ; Meijer, Sebastiaan ; Smit, J.J. ; Sibbald, P.

Author_Institution

Delft Univ. of Technol., Delft, Netherlands

fYear

2012

fDate

23-27 Sept. 2012

Firstpage

313

Lastpage

316

Abstract

In GIS, the diagnostic outcomes have to be interpreted in a structural way to support maintenance decisions. Therefore criteria or knowledge rules are required. In this contribution, the following questions have been answered: 1. Which components have to be diagnosis? 2. Which diagnostic methods have to be used? 3. How to interpret the diagnostic outcomes to estimate the components actual condition? The criticality of the GIS components has been determined. The critical components in GIS get the highest priority to be diagnosed. Thereafter, diagnostic methods which are required to prevent failures with unacceptable risk level in GIS are distinguished. Finally, knowledge rules are developed to interpret the diagnostics outcomes.

Keywords

failure analysis; gas insulated substations; maintenance engineering; risk analysis; GIS components; components actual condition; critical components; diagnostics outcomes; failure prevention; knowledge rules development; maintenance decisions; unacceptable risk level; Circuit breakers; Gas insulation; Interrupters; Maintenance engineering; Reliability; Switches; GIS; knowlage rules; maintenance decision;

fLanguage

English

Publisher

ieee

Conference_Titel

Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD), 2012 International Conference on

Conference_Location

Bali

Print_ISBN

978-1-4673-1019-2

Type

conf

DOI

10.1109/CMD.2012.6416440

Filename

6416440