DocumentCode
3028990
Title
Guide to the best and worst HPCMP systems for executing individual TI-04 benchmarking applications and synthetics
Author
Campbell, Roy L., Jr.
Author_Institution
Computational & Inf. Sci. Directorate, US Army Res. Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
fYear
2004
fDate
7-11 June 2004
Firstpage
294
Lastpage
297
Abstract
Since time-to-solution and processor scalability of an application can vary greatly from one architecture to another, it is important to consider the suitability of each system with respect to that application in order to make efficient use of available resources. Given that the full set of possible applications is quite large, this paper focuses on those applications within the FY-04 technology insertion (TI-04) benchmarking suite - AERO, COBALT-60, GAMESS, HYCOM, NAMD, OOCore, and RF-CTH - for which all except AERO have a standard and large test case. Both the overall performance and performance per processor of the High Performance Computing Modernization Program´s (HPCMP´s) major systems are analyzed for each test case in order to provide general selection guidance to users and a unique perspective for code developers.
Keywords
benchmark testing; computer architecture; multiprocessing systems; parallel processing; performance evaluation; AERO; COBALT-60; FY-04 technology insertion benchmarking; GAMESS; HYCOM; High Performance Computing Modernization Program; NAMD; OOCore; RF-CTH; TI-04 benchmarking application; processor scalability; Benchmark testing; Computer architecture; Government; High performance computing; Instruction sets; Laboratories; Military computing; Performance analysis; Scalability; System testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Users Group Conference (DOD_UGC'04), 2004
Conference_Location
Williamsburg, VA, USA
Print_ISBN
0-7695-2259-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/DOD_UGC.2004.19
Filename
1420887
Link To Document