• DocumentCode
    3042989
  • Title

    Comparison of ASCET and UML - Preparations for an abstract software architecture

  • Author

    Ahrens, D. ; Pfeiffer, A. ; Bertram, T.

  • Author_Institution
    BMW Group, Munich
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    23-25 Sept. 2008
  • Firstpage
    233
  • Lastpage
    234
  • Abstract
    For efficient software engineering in automotive applications the executed design processes must separate general properties and characteristics of the created system from implementation and realisation details as long as possible. This short paper shows how software architectures can be displayed on an abstract level by using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) and how these abstract depictions can be transferred to commonly used design and code generation tools either manually or by automation. Formal methods and transformation rules can be applied by using the Extensible Markup Language (XML). The methods are exemplarily shown for ASCET SE by ETAS.
  • Keywords
    Unified Modeling Language; XML; automotive engineering; software architecture; ASCET; Extensible Markup Language; UML; Unified Modeling Language; abstract software architecture; formal method; Automotive applications; Automotive engineering; Design automation; Process design; Software architecture; Software engineering; Software systems; Software tools; Unified modeling language; XML;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Specification, Verification and Design Languages, 2008. FDL 2008. Forum on
  • Conference_Location
    Stuttgart
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2264-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FDL.2008.4641451
  • Filename
    4641451