• DocumentCode
    304448
  • Title

    Fractal coding versus classified transform coding

  • Author

    Domaszewicz, Jaroslaw ; Kukinski, S. ; Vaishampayan, Vinay A.

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Telecommun., Warsaw Univ. of Technol., Poland
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    16-19 Sep 1996
  • Firstpage
    149
  • Abstract
    Fractal coding and classified transform coding exhibit strong structural similarity, but they use different types of redundancy in image data: piecewise self-similarity in one case and local correlation in the other. Comparing performance of the two techniques leads to a quantitative, compression-oriented definition of piecewise self-similarity. The amount of piecewise self-similarity is evaluated for sample images. For a moderate number of domain blocks, classified transform coding consistently outperforms fractal coding, and the images are not found to be piecewise self-similar. As the number of domain blocks increases, the performance gap becomes negligible
  • Keywords
    correlation methods; data compression; fractals; image coding; redundancy; transform coding; classified transform coding; domain blocks; fractal coding; image coding; image compression; local correlation; piecewise self-similarity; redundancy; Bit rate; Discrete cosine transforms; Fractals; Image coding; Image reconstruction; Karhunen-Loeve transforms; Quantization; Transform coding; Vectors;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Image Processing, 1996. Proceedings., International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Lausanne
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3259-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICIP.1996.559455
  • Filename
    559455