DocumentCode
304448
Title
Fractal coding versus classified transform coding
Author
Domaszewicz, Jaroslaw ; Kukinski, S. ; Vaishampayan, Vinay A.
Author_Institution
Inst. of Telecommun., Warsaw Univ. of Technol., Poland
Volume
1
fYear
1996
fDate
16-19 Sep 1996
Firstpage
149
Abstract
Fractal coding and classified transform coding exhibit strong structural similarity, but they use different types of redundancy in image data: piecewise self-similarity in one case and local correlation in the other. Comparing performance of the two techniques leads to a quantitative, compression-oriented definition of piecewise self-similarity. The amount of piecewise self-similarity is evaluated for sample images. For a moderate number of domain blocks, classified transform coding consistently outperforms fractal coding, and the images are not found to be piecewise self-similar. As the number of domain blocks increases, the performance gap becomes negligible
Keywords
correlation methods; data compression; fractals; image coding; redundancy; transform coding; classified transform coding; domain blocks; fractal coding; image coding; image compression; local correlation; piecewise self-similarity; redundancy; Bit rate; Discrete cosine transforms; Fractals; Image coding; Image reconstruction; Karhunen-Loeve transforms; Quantization; Transform coding; Vectors;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Image Processing, 1996. Proceedings., International Conference on
Conference_Location
Lausanne
Print_ISBN
0-7803-3259-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICIP.1996.559455
Filename
559455
Link To Document