DocumentCode
3055254
Title
Policy division and fusion: examples and a method-or, multiple classifiers considered harmful
Author
Kanada, Yasusi
Author_Institution
Res. & Dev. Group, Hitachi Ltd., Yokohama, Japan
fYear
2001
fDate
2001
Firstpage
545
Lastpage
560
Abstract
Because higher- and lower-level policies do not necessarily correspond one-to-one, a higher-level network policy may have to be translated into two or more lower-level policies, and two or more cooperating higher-level policies may have to be translated into one lower-level policy. The former transformation is called a policy division, and the latter transformation is called a policy fusion. These transformations can be performed mechanically under certain restricted conditions, as described in this paper. In general, however, such transformations are very complicated, and the restrictions cannot be eliminated completely. This is mainly due to the existence of multiple packet classifiers in a set of policies. This paper thus concludes that multiple classifiers should not be introduced, if possible. Policy division and fusion can be avoided in certain cases, but are probably unavoidable in other cases. Given this, these problems should be solved by introducing virtual flow labels to remove harmful classifiers and conducting further studies on policy division and fusion
Keywords
Internet; computer network management; fusion; higher-level policies; lower-level policies; multiple classifiers; multiple packet classifiers; policy division; transformation; virtual flow labels; Access control; Diffserv networks; Hardware; IP networks; Internet; Network servers; Protocols; Resource management; Utility programs; Web server;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Integrated Network Management Proceedings, 2001 IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Seattle, WA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6719-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/INM.2001.918065
Filename
918065
Link To Document