• DocumentCode
    3061135
  • Title

    Search Engine Overlaps : Do they agree or disagree?

  • Author

    Bailey, John ; Zhang, Cheng ; Budgen, David ; Charters, Stuart ; Turner, Mark

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Durham, Durham
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    20-26 May 2007
  • Firstpage
    2
  • Lastpage
    2
  • Abstract
    Secondary studies, such as systematic literature reviews and mapping studies, are an essential element of the evidence-based paradigm. A critical part of the review process is the identification of all relevant research. As such, any researcher intending to conduct a secondary review should be aware of the strengths and weakness of the search engines available. Analyse the overlap between search engine results for software engineering studies. Three independent studies were conducted to evaluate the overlap between multiple search engines for different search areas. The findings indicate that very little overlap was found between the search engines. To complete a systematic review, researchers must use multiple search terms and search engines. The lack of overlap might also be caused by inconsistent keyword selection amongst authors.
  • Keywords
    search engines; software engineering; keyword selection; multiple search terms; search engine; software engineering; Aggregates; Computer science; Data analysis; Databases; Mathematics; Protocols; Publishing; Search engines; Software design; Software engineering;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering, 2007. REBSE '07. Second International Workshop on
  • Conference_Location
    Minneapolis, MN
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-2962-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/REBSE.2007.4
  • Filename
    4273274