DocumentCode
307079
Title
The uniform distribution: rigorous justification for its use in robustness analysis
Author
Barmish, B.R. ; Lagoa, C.M.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI, USA
Volume
3
fYear
1996
fDate
11-13 Dec 1996
Firstpage
3418
Abstract
Consider a control system with admissible uncertain parameter values which exceed the bounds specified by classical robustness theory. The article concerns trade-offs between performance degradation risk and uncertainty tolerance. If a large increase in the uncertainty bound can be established, an acceptably small risk may be justified. Since robustness formulations do not include statistical descriptions of the uncertainty, the question arises whether it is possible to provide such assurances for any distribution. The paper concentrates on problems associated with Kharitonov´s theorem and the edge theorem. If p(s, q) denote the uncertain polynomial under consideration and 𝒫(ω) a frequency dependent convex target set for the uncertain values p(jω, q), 𝒫(ω) symmetric with respect to the nominal p(jω, 0), the uncertain parameters qi zero-mean independent random variables with known support interval, and for each uncertainty ℱ consists of symmetric nonincreasing density functions, then, for fixed frequency ω, the first theorem indicates that the probability that p(jω, q) is in 𝒫(ω) is minimized by the uniform distribution for q. The second theorem, a generalization of the first, indicates that the same result holds uniformly with respect to frequency. Then, probabilistic guarantees for robust stability are given in the third theorem. In many cases, one can far exceed classical robustness margins while keeping the risk of instability small
Keywords
control system analysis; probability; robust control; stability criteria; uncertain systems; Kharitonov´s theorem; admissible uncertain parameter values; control system; edge theorem; frequency-dependent convex target set; performance degradation risk; rigorous justification; robustness analysis; robustness margins; statistical descriptions; symmetric nonincreasing density functions; uncertain polynomial; uncertainty bound; uncertainty tolerance; uniform distribution; Control systems; Degradation; Density functional theory; Frequency dependence; Polynomials; Power capacitors; Random variables; Robust control; Robustness; Uncertainty;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Decision and Control, 1996., Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Conference on
Conference_Location
Kobe
ISSN
0191-2216
Print_ISBN
0-7803-3590-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CDC.1996.573689
Filename
573689
Link To Document