DocumentCode
3079560
Title
Adaptive ultrasonic imaging using SONOLINE ElegraTM
Author
Liu, D. L Donald ; Sutcliffe, P. ; McDermott, B. ; Lazenby, John ; Von Behren, Pat ; Kim, Jin
Author_Institution
Siemens Med. Syst. Ultrasound Group, Issaquah, WA, USA
Volume
2
fYear
2000
fDate
36800
Firstpage
1655
Abstract
Data acquisition, time delay estimation and correction for adaptive imaging are implemented on the SONOLINE ElegraTM system using the system CPU, the Crescendo(TM) processor, and the existing front-end electronics, with no hardware modifications. With the current implementation, phase aberration correction takes about 2 seconds from activation to completion. The effects of compensating the transmit beam are studied using the waveform similarity factor and single transmit imaging. On a scattering phantom plus a 1-D aberration layer with an rms time fluctuation of 40 ns and correlation length of 5 mm, the waveform similarity factor of randomly scattered waveforms improved from 0.362 to 0.477 by iteration. Correspondingly, the -20 dB lateral resolution improved from 1.62 mm to 0.77 mm, and the image contrast improved by 8.5 dB (the speckle region is 6 dB brighter while the echo-free region is 2.5 dB darker). Experiments with a 2-D aberration layer and with a special phase aberration phantom showed less image improvements. Preliminary body scan trials with adaptive imaging showed improved image contrast and details in some cases but the results are mixed and influenced by such factors as isoplanatic patch size and complex scattering structures
Keywords
aberrations; acoustic correlation; adaptive signal processing; biomedical ultrasonics; data acquisition; image resolution; medical image processing; speckle; ultrasonic scattering; 1-D aberration layer; 2-D aberration layer; Crescendo processor; SONOLINE Elegra; adaptive ultrasonic imaging; body scan trials; complex scattering structures; correlation length; data acquisition; echo-free region; front-end electronics; image contrast; image improvements; improved image contrast; isoplanatic patch size; iteration; lateral resolution; phase aberration correction; randomly scattered waveforms; rms time fluctuation; scattering phantom; single transmit imaging; special phase aberration phantom; speckle region; system CPU; time delay correction; time delay estimation; transmit beam compensation; waveform similarity factor; Acoustic imaging; Data acquisition; Delay effects; Delay estimation; Fluctuations; Hardware; Image resolution; Imaging phantoms; Scattering; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Ultrasonics Symposium, 2000 IEEE
Conference_Location
San Juan
ISSN
1051-0117
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6365-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921640
Filename
921640
Link To Document