• DocumentCode
    3083518
  • Title

    In defence of the precautionary principle

  • Author

    Weckert, John

  • Author_Institution
    Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    7-9 June 2010
  • Firstpage
    42
  • Lastpage
    47
  • Abstract
    The precautionary principle is widely advocated, especially in Europe, but also much attacked. In this paper the principle will first be outlined and then some of the common criticisms discussed. One in particular will be examined in some depth; the criticism is that it is inherently paradoxical. The paradox supposedly arises because if the principle is applied to some action that is potentially harmful, it should also be applied to that application of it which is also potentially harmful, because it stops an action that is beneficial. Here it will be argued that the precautionary principle is not paradoxical and that it is important and useful.
  • Keywords
    law administration; Europe; precautionary principle; Ethics; Europe; Genetics; Humans; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Public healthcare; Radiofrequency identification; Robots; Semiconductor device measurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Technology and Society (ISTAS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Wollongong, NSW
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-7777-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514653
  • Filename
    5514653