• DocumentCode
    3092906
  • Title

    An experimental evaluation of response bias and respondent preference for a computerized survey as compared to a paper and pencil survey

  • Author

    Fellers, Jack W. ; Anson, Robert G. ; Anson, Patricia Harvey

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Decision Sci., Hawaii Univ., Honolulu, HI, USA
  • Volume
    iv
  • fYear
    1990
  • fDate
    2-5 Jan 1990
  • Firstpage
    488
  • Abstract
    Computerized surveys offer important cost and time efficiencies for conducting research. The primary question concerning their use, however, involves the introduction of potential response effects and negative reception by respondents. To test for possible response effects, randomly assigned respondents completed a survey (concerning survey method preferences) using either a paper-and-pencil method or a computerized method. The study found little or no response bias effects involving the survey method. Furthermore, respondents overwhelmingly preferred using the computerized survey over the paper-and-pencil survey
  • Keywords
    behavioural sciences; computerized survey; experimental evaluation; paper and pencil survey; respondent preference; response bias; Application software; Computer applications; Computer errors; Costs; Data analysis; Educational institutions; Lifting equipment; Potential well; Statistical analysis; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    System Sciences, 1990., Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Kailua-Kona, HI
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/HICSS.1990.205295
  • Filename
    205295