DocumentCode :
3101035
Title :
Effect of aperture size on plane wave ultrasound strain estimation
Author :
Vaka, Narasimha Reddy ; Hansen, Hendrik H. G. ; Saris, Anne E. C. M. ; de Korte, Chris L.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Radiol., Radboud Univ. Nijmegen Med. Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
fYear :
2013
fDate :
21-25 July 2013
Firstpage :
333
Lastpage :
336
Abstract :
Assessment of axial strain and lateral strain is of major importance for studying the mechanical properties of tissue. In this study the effect of beamforming on the accuracy of axial and lateral strain estimation was investigated. Radio frequency (RF) data were generated for non steered plane wave insonation using an eccentric plaque vessel simulated with Field II and experiments with a homogeneous vessel phantom using a Verasonics, Inc. (Redmond, WA). Beamforming was executed by employing two techniques, delay-and-sum (DAS) and Fourier based reconstruction (FBR). In the course of DAS beamforming, RF-data were processed with different f-number settings and its impact on 2D cross-correlation based strain estimation was investigated. Subsequently, beamforming was performed with FBR. Strain estimation obtained from FBR and non apodized (NAPOD) DAS beamformed RF data were compared. In the simulation study, strain estimation was analyzed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) with respect to the theoretical strain. Simulation results showed that lateral strain estimation can be improved by decreasing the f-number, but that there was almost no influence on axial strain. The strain estimation in phantom experiments was evaluated in terms of the elastographic signal-to-noise ratio (SNRe). The experimental results also showed that lateral strain tends to improve for decreasing f-number, but hardly affects axial strain. Comparing the strain results between NAPOD DAS and FBR, FBR provides a reduction of 0.13% RMSE for axial strain and NAPOD DAS showed a reduction of 0.27% in lateral strain. In conclusion, the f-number influences lateral strain estimation, but seems to have a negligible effect on axial strain estimation. FBR is more accurate for axial strain estimation, whereas NAPOD DAS is more accurate for lateral strain estimation.
Keywords :
Fourier transforms; biomechanics; biomedical ultrasonics; blood vessels; elasticity; image reconstruction; mean square error methods; medical image processing; phantoms; ultrasonic imaging; 2D cross-correlation based strain estimation; DAS beamforming; Fourier based reconstruction; RF-data processing; Verasonics; aperture size effect; axial strain assessment; axial strain estimation; beamforming effect; delay-and-sum technique; eccentric plaque vessel simulation; elastographic signal-to-noise ratio; f-number settings; homogeneous vessel phantom; lateral strain assessment; lateral strain estimation; nonsteered plane wave insonation; phantom experiments; plane wave ultrasound strain estimation; radiofrequency data generation; root-mean-square error; theoretical strain; tissue mechanical properties; Apertures; Array signal processing; Estimation; Phantoms; Strain; Ultrasonic imaging; Elastography; Fourier reconstruction; aperture width; axial strain; delay and sum; dynamic focusing; f-number; lateral strain;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2013 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Prague
ISSN :
1948-5719
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-5684-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ULTSYM.2013.0086
Filename :
6725262
Link To Document :
بازگشت