A comparative study of Lithium Poly-Carbon Monoflouride (Li/CFx) and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) battery chemistries for State of Charge Indicator design

Author

William, Edward James, II ; Gupta, Yishu ; Huff, Matthew ; Linda, Ondrej ; Nance, Jasper ; Hess, Herbert ; Manic, Milos ; Rufus, Freeman ; Thakker, Ash ; Govar, Justin

Author_Institution

Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA

fYear

2009

fDate

5-8 July 2009

Firstpage

2006

Lastpage

2009

Abstract

This paper determines if Li/CFx or LiFePO4 is beneficial for State of Charge Indicator (SOCI) design for military applications. This is achieved by analyzing and comparing data from the battery chemistry of Lithium Poly-Carbon Monoflouride (Li/CFx) and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4). The chemistry of Li/CFx and LiFePO4 have different discharge responses based on environmental conditions that can affect how a SOCI responds.

Keywords

lithium compounds; power electronics; secondary cells; battery chemistries; lithium iron phosphate; lithium poly-carbon monoflouride; military applications; power electronics; state of charge indicator design; Batteries; Chemistry; Consumer electronics; Costs; Electrodes; Energy consumption; Iron; Lithium compounds; Prototypes; Safety; Batteries; Battery Chargers; Detectors; Nonlinear estimation; Power electronics;

fLanguage

English

Publisher

ieee

Conference_Titel

Industrial Electronics, 2009. ISIE 2009. IEEE International Symposium on

Conference_Location

Seoul

Print_ISBN

978-1-4244-4347-5

Electronic_ISBN

978-1-4244-4349-9

Type

conf

DOI

10.1109/ISIE.2009.5214707

Filename

5214707