• DocumentCode
    3148202
  • Title

    Derivative regulation and its impact on energy and utility firms

  • Author

    Gentzoglanis, A.

  • Author_Institution
    Res. Group GReFA, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    27-31 May 2013
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    Gas and electricity companies could be negatively affected by the introduction of Dodd-Frank (DF) Act in the USA and the EMIR regulation in Europe. The analysis and critical examination of the theoretical and empirical literature demonstrate that indeed hedging costs increase when transactions are subject to mandatory margining. If these costs are the only important variable in judging the efficiency of this regulation then, justifiably, its introduction is not Pareto improving. But the main objective of the derivative regulation is the control of systemic risk and the recent studies neglect to take these potential benefits into consideration. It is only when both costs and benefits are equally weighted that the desirability of the derivative regulation.
  • Keywords
    cost-benefit analysis; power markets; Dodd-Frank Act; EMIR regulation; European market infrastructure regulation; Pareto improvement; derivative regulation; energy firms; hedging cost; mandatory margining; utility firms; Electronic mail; Europe; Clearing; Dodd-Frank Act; European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR); OTC energy derivatives; electricity; gas; margined derivative;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    European Energy Market (EEM), 2013 10th International Conference on the
  • Conference_Location
    Stockholm
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/EEM.2013.6607319
  • Filename
    6607319