• DocumentCode
    3153979
  • Title

    The comparative analysis about rotational error separation with three-point method and approximate three-point method

  • Author

    Ping, Ma ; JianJian, Huang ; DuanNeng, Li

  • Author_Institution
    Guangdong Univ. of Technol., Guangzhou, China
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    16-18 April 2011
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    5
  • Abstract
    This paper has contrasted the separation accuracy of three-point method and approximate three-point method in rotational error. And further analysis the sensitivity of the sensor installation error by two different measurement methods. Simulation results show that the separation accuracy in both roundness error and rotational error by three-point method is higher than two-point method. Approximate three-point method in roundness error separation is more complete than rotational error. So it only can be considered for special occasions.
  • Keywords
    error compensation; measurement errors; approximate three-point method; comparative analysis; measurement method; rotational error separation; roundness error; sensor installation error; Accuracy; Approximation methods; Equations; Harmonic analysis; Mathematical model; Measurement uncertainty; Rotation measurement; Approximate Three-point Method; Artifact Roundness; Simulation; Spindle Error Motion; Three-point Method;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), 2011 International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    XianNing
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-61284-458-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CECNET.2011.5768524
  • Filename
    5768524