DocumentCode
3177152
Title
Comparison of similarity measures for clustering electrocardiogram complexes
Author
Chang, K.-C. ; Lee, R.G. ; Wen, C. ; Yeh, M.F.
Author_Institution
Lunghwa Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Taoyuan
fYear
2005
fDate
25-28 Sept. 2005
Firstpage
759
Lastpage
762
Abstract
This paper compares four similarity measures such as the city block (L1-norm), the Euclidean (L2-norm), the normalized correlation coefficient, and the simplified gray relational grade for clustering QRS complexes. Performances of the measures include classification accuracy, threshold value selection, noise robustness, and execution time. The clustering algorithm used is the so-called two-step unsupervised method. The best out of the 10 independent runs of the clustering algorithm with randomly selected initial template beat for each run is used to compare the performances of each similarity measure. Simulation results show that the simplified gray relational grade outperforms the other measures
Keywords
correlation methods; electrocardiography; medical signal processing; pattern clustering; signal classification; Euclidean distance; QRS complex; city block; classification accuracy; clustering algorithm; electrocardiogram complex clustering; execution time; noise robustness; normalized correlation coefficient; similarity measures; simplified gray relational grade; threshold value selection; two-step unsupervised method; Cities and towns; Classification algorithms; Clustering algorithms; Electrocardiography; Noise measurement; Noise robustness; Performance evaluation; Relational databases; Roentgenium; Time measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computers in Cardiology, 2005
Conference_Location
Lyon
Print_ISBN
0-7803-9337-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CIC.2005.1588215
Filename
1588215
Link To Document