• DocumentCode
    3188256
  • Title

    Improved predictions of the flow field in submerged and confined impinging jets using the Reynolds stress model

  • Author

    Morris, Garron K. ; Garimella, Suresh V. ; Fitzgerald, Janice A.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng., Wisconsin Univ., Milwaukee, WI, USA
  • fYear
    1998
  • fDate
    27-30 May 1998
  • Firstpage
    362
  • Lastpage
    370
  • Abstract
    The flow field of a normally impinging, axisymmetric, confined and submerged liquid jet is predicted using the Reynolds stress turbulence closure model in the FLUENT finite-volume code. The results are compared with experimental measurements and flow visualizations, and are used to describe the position of the recirculating toroid in the outflow region which is characteristic of the confined flow field. Changes in the recirculation pattern features due to changes in Reynolds number, nozzle diameter and nozzle-to-target plate spacing are documented. Results are presented for nozzle diameters of 3.18 and 6.35 mm, jet Reynolds numbers in the 2000-23000 range, and nozzle-to-target plate spacings of 2, 3, and 4 jet diameters. Up to three interacting vortical structures are predicted in the confinement region at the smaller Reynolds numbers. The primary recirculation pattern center moves away from the jet center line with an increase in Reynolds number, nozzle diameter, and nozzle-to-target plate spacing. Computed flow patterns were in very good qualitative agreement with experiments. The radial location of the primary toroid center was predicted to within ±40% and ±3% of the experimental position for Re=2000-4000 and Re=8500-23000, respectively. The jet center line velocity after the nozzle exit was computed with an average error of 6%. Reasons for the differences between the numerical predictions at Re=2000-4000 and experiments are discussed. Flow field predictions using the standard high-Reynolds number k-ε and renormalization group theory (RNG) k-ε models are shown to be inferior to Reynolds stress model predictions
  • Keywords
    confined flow; cooling; error analysis; finite volume methods; flow visualisation; jets; laser velocimetry; nozzles; renormalisation; stress analysis; thermal management (packaging); turbulence; vortices; 3.18 mm; 6.35 mm; FLUENT finite-volume code; Reynolds number; Reynolds stress model; Reynolds stress model predictions; Reynolds stress turbulence closure model; axisymmetric confined submerged liquid jet; computed flow patterns; confined flow field; confined impinging jets; confinement region; flow field; flow field prediction; flow visualization; interacting vortical structures; jet Reynolds number; jet center line; jet center line velocity; jet center line velocity computation error; jet impingement cooling; laser Doppler velocimetry; normally impinging liquid jet; nozzle diameter; nozzle exit; nozzle-to-target plate spacing; numerical prediction; outflow region; primary recirculation pattern center; radial primary toroid center location; recirculating toroid position; recirculation pattern features; renormalization group theory models; standard high-Reynolds number models; submerged impinging jets; Electronics cooling; Fluid dynamics; Fluid flow measurement; Heat transfer; Mechanical engineering; Predictive models; Stress; Thermal management of electronics; Viscosity; Visualization;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, 1998. ITHERM '98. The Sixth Intersociety Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Seattle, WA
  • ISSN
    1089-9870
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-4475-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ITHERM.1998.689588
  • Filename
    689588