DocumentCode
3196887
Title
Comparison of asymptotic methods for predicting the electromagnetic scattering from engine cavities
Author
Andersh, D.J. ; Fath, J.L. ; Terzuoli, A.J., Jr.
Author_Institution
Sch. of Eng., Air Force Inst. of Technol., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
fYear
1992
fDate
18-25 June 1992
Firstpage
941
Abstract
The authors document the results of the comparison of high-frequency electromagnetic scattering prediction methods for jet engines in the time and frequency domains. In particular, hybrid asymptotic modal techniques, and shooting and bouncing ray techniques are compared. It is concluded that ray methods provide an excellent first-order approximation to the RCS (radar cross section) and resultant radar signature for engine ducts. Given that ray methods are applicable to a wide range of geometries, they appear to be an excellent all-purpose method to predict the radar signature of engine ducts. It is noted, however, that there are questions in the prediction accuracy using ray methods that must be considered when calculating the RCS or radar signature of engine ducts.<>
Keywords
aerospace engines; electromagnetic wave scattering; radar applications; radar cross-sections; HF EM scattering prediction; RCS; asymptotic methods; bouncing rays; engine cavities; engine ducts; first-order approximation; frequency domain; hybrid asymptotic modal techniques; jet engines; prediction accuracy; radar cross section; radar signature; ray methods; shooting rays; time domain; Blades; Ducts; Electromagnetic scattering; Frequency domain analysis; Geometry; Jet engines; Radar cross section; Radar detection; Radar scattering; Ray tracing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1992. AP-S. 1992 Digest. Held in Conjuction with: URSI Radio Science Meeting and Nuclear EMP Meeting., IEEE
Conference_Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0730-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/APS.1992.221796
Filename
221796
Link To Document