DocumentCode :
321115
Title :
Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly
Author :
Le Feber, Joost ; Van Asselt, EIS ; Van Mastrigt, Ron
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Urology, Erasmus Univ., Rotterdam, Netherlands
Volume :
1
fYear :
1996
fDate :
31 Oct-3 Nov 1996
Firstpage :
357
Abstract :
A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip ). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAMON appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NA mon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording
Keywords :
bioelectric potentials; biological techniques; neurophysiology; white noise; high firing rate; integrated rectified bipolar recording; monopolar measurements; nerve signals measurements; rectified signal; simulated nerve signal; Biological system modeling; Biomembranes; Conductors; Electrodes; Extracellular; Frequency; Medical simulation; Noise measurement; Shape; White noise;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
Amsterdam
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3811-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656991
Filename :
656991
Link To Document :
بازگشت