DocumentCode
321115
Title
Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly
Author
Le Feber, Joost ; Van Asselt, EIS ; Van Mastrigt, Ron
Author_Institution
Dept. of Urology, Erasmus Univ., Rotterdam, Netherlands
Volume
1
fYear
1996
fDate
31 Oct-3 Nov 1996
Firstpage
357
Abstract
A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip ). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAMON appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NA mon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording
Keywords
bioelectric potentials; biological techniques; neurophysiology; white noise; high firing rate; integrated rectified bipolar recording; monopolar measurements; nerve signals measurements; rectified signal; simulated nerve signal; Biological system modeling; Biomembranes; Conductors; Electrodes; Extracellular; Frequency; Medical simulation; Noise measurement; Shape; White noise;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location
Amsterdam
Print_ISBN
0-7803-3811-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656991
Filename
656991
Link To Document