• DocumentCode
    321115
  • Title

    Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly

  • Author

    Le Feber, Joost ; Van Asselt, EIS ; Van Mastrigt, Ron

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Urology, Erasmus Univ., Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    31 Oct-3 Nov 1996
  • Firstpage
    357
  • Abstract
    A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip ). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAMON appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NA mon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording
  • Keywords
    bioelectric potentials; biological techniques; neurophysiology; white noise; high firing rate; integrated rectified bipolar recording; monopolar measurements; nerve signals measurements; rectified signal; simulated nerve signal; Biological system modeling; Biomembranes; Conductors; Electrodes; Extracellular; Frequency; Medical simulation; Noise measurement; Shape; White noise;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Amsterdam
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3811-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656991
  • Filename
    656991