• DocumentCode
    32153
  • Title

    Giving Meaning to RFID and Cochlear Implants

  • Author

    Wagemakers, Sandra ; Van Zoonen, Liesbet ; Turner, Greg

  • Author_Institution
    Tilburg Univ., Tilburg, Netherlands
  • Volume
    33
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Summer 2014
  • Firstpage
    73
  • Lastpage
    80
  • Abstract
    In this article, we focus on people such as Randall and Edith; people who have either a cochlear implant for hearing improvement or a RFID implant. Both types of implants have caused controversy. The main opposition to CIs comes from the deaf community itself, which with the capital D signifies this minority culture. Deaf people consider themselves a socio-linguistic minority culture with sign language as their language [1]. They argue that CI undervalues the identity of being deaf: there is nothing wrong with being deaf, they are not disabled, and they do not need to be fixed. Controversies about RFID implants are more diverse and come from different groups: they include medical issues [2], [3], worries about physical assault [4], issues with privacy and the security of the collected data [3]-[7], a fear for dehumanization [3], and worries from Christians who consider the tag to be the “Mark of the Beast” as described in the book of Revelation [8].
  • Keywords
    cochlear implants; radiofrequency identification; CI; RFID implant; cochlear implant; collected data security; deaf community; dehumanization; hearing improvement; medical issues; physical assault; privacy; sign language; socio-linguistic minority culture; Auditory system; Cochlear implants; Radiofrequency identification; Security; Wearable computers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0097
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MTS.2014.2319978
  • Filename
    6824315