DocumentCode
3225960
Title
In vitro comparative study of the performance of pulse sequences for ultrasound contrast imaging of the carotid artery
Author
Renaud, G. ; Bosch, J.G. ; de Jong, N. ; van der Steen, A.F.W.
Author_Institution
Biomed. Eng., Thorax Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
fYear
2011
fDate
18-21 Oct. 2011
Firstpage
628
Lastpage
631
Abstract
This study intends to identify the best pulse sequences for ultrasound contrast imaging of the carotid artery by comparing a fairly exhaustive list of pulse sequences reported in literature. A good candidate must provide sensitive detection of contrast microbubbles, efficient suppression of tissue echoes and prevent artifacts. Especially the far wall artifact caused by nonlinear propagation through contrast agent dramatically impairs the detection of microbubbles in any region located behind a vessel. Pulse inversion, amplitude modulation, chirp reversal, subharmonic imaging, pulse subtraction time delay, radial modulation and ring-down imaging are investigated in vitro. A focused single-element transducer used in pulse-echo mode transmits ultrasound waves and receive backscattered signals in the frequency range of 3 MHz to 8 MHz. Transmitted waveforms are designed with a low mechanical index between 0.1 and 0.2. In a water tank, the transducer acquires a single line through a thin-wall tube containing diluted (1:5000) contrast agent (SonoVue, Bracco). A thin metallic wire is placed in front of the tube and a piece of rubber is positioned behind the tube to evaluate the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and the contrast-to-artifact ratio (CAR), respectively. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is determined by comparing backscattered signals from contrast agent with that of pure water. Only subharmonic imaging and ring-down imaging are free from the far wall artifact. Summing CNR, CAR and CTR, ring-down imaging (Hansen et al., IEEE Trans. UFFC, vol. 58(2), 2011) turns out to be the best candidate (CNR+CAR+CTR = 18 dB).
Keywords
biomedical ultrasonics; blood vessels; medical signal processing; ultrasonic imaging; ultrasonic propagation; ultrasonic transducers; Bracco contrast agent; SonoVue contrast agent; amplitude modulation; backscattered signal receiving; carotid artery; chirp reversal; contrast microbubble sensitive detection; contrast-to-artifact ratio; contrast-to-tissue ratio; focused single-element transducer; frequency 3 MHz to 8 MHz; mechanical index; nonlinear propagation; pulse inversion; pulse sequences; pulse subtraction time delay; pulse-echo mode; radial modulation; ring-down imaging; rubber; subharmonic imaging; thin metallic wire; thin wall tube; tissue echoes suppression; ultrasound contrast imaging; ultrasound wave transmission; vessel; wall artifact; water tank; Acoustics; Chirp; Electron tubes; Frequency modulation; Imaging; Transducers; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011 IEEE International
Conference_Location
Orlando, FL
ISSN
1948-5719
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-1253-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ULTSYM.2011.0152
Filename
6293199
Link To Document