• DocumentCode
    3263550
  • Title

    Between detection and neutralization

  • Author

    Adams, Douglas G. ; Snell, Mark K. ; Green, Mary W. ; Pritchard, Daniel A.

  • Author_Institution
    Sandia Nat. Labs., Albuquerque, NM
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    11-14 Oct. 2005
  • Firstpage
    226
  • Lastpage
    229
  • Abstract
    Security system analytical performance analysis is generally based on the probability of system effectiveness. The probability of effectiveness is a function of the probabilities of interruption and neutralization. Interruption occurs if the response forces are notified in sufficient time to engage the adversary. Neutralization occurs if the adversary attack is defeated after the security forces have actively engaged the adversary. Both depend upon communications of data. This paper explores details of embedded communications functions that are often assumed to be inconsequential. It is the intent of the authors to bring focus to an issue in security system modeling that, if not well understood, has the potential to be a deciding factor in the overall system failure or effectiveness
  • Keywords
    data communication; security of data; communications function; data communication; effectiveness probability; security forces; security system analytical performance analysis; security system modeling; system effectiveness; system failure; Communication system security; Data security; Detectors; Laboratories; Modeling; National security; Performance analysis; Probability; Sensor systems; Weapons;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Security Technology, 2005. CCST '05. 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Las Palmas
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-9245-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CCST.2005.1594846
  • Filename
    1594846