Author_Institution :
Manage. Sch., Wuhan Univ. of Technol., Wuhan, China
Abstract :
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
In recent years, emergency management of public incidents has become a new subject, to which the governments all over the world and the international society as a whole have paid much attention. Also it is being placed more importance in the field of public management than ever before. Even so, what the relevant researches have achieved is quite poor. There exists no such perfect framework for theoretic analysis. And on the other hand, a good interaction between the government agencies and research institutes has not been formed. Therefore, it is essential and also urgent to seek an adaptable emergency management system both in theories and in practices. Moreover, SARS and the significant public incidents having occurred in China this year have posed new requirements on emergency management system. This paper, on the basis of summarizing the current research results concerning emergency management, suggests an all-round management system which covers such concepts as whole-process management, multi-system management, all-round emergency response, multi-means management and all-social-staff management of public incidents. This paper also argues that it is essential to form a dynamic assessment and improvement mechanism for emergency management, based on which a breakthrough is expected to be achieved. A special monitoring agency should be established to conduct a periodic assessment on the integrated capability of all-round emergency management, so that the problems and weaknesses can be recognized in time and the- emergency management system be perfected continuously.
Keywords :
decision making; decision theory; emergency services; all-round emergency response; all-round management system; all-social-staff management; decision making theory; dynamic assessment; government agency; international society; multimeans management; multisystem management; periodic assessment; public emergency management; public incident; whole-process management; Conference management; Crisis management; Disaster management; Engineering management; Government; Hazards; Monitoring; Rain; Risk management; Technology management; all-round emergency management; assessment system; break-through; integrated capability; public incident;
