DocumentCode :
3325330
Title :
Geant4 evaluation of the impact of spatial resolution improvement on the contrast recovery coefficient in a small-animal PET system with collimation
Author :
Ayan, Ahmet S. ; Accorsi, Roberto ; Karp, Joel S. ; Metzler, Scott D.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Radiol., Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
fYear :
2009
fDate :
Oct. 24 2009-Nov. 1 2009
Firstpage :
2882
Lastpage :
2887
Abstract :
Two limitations on the resolution of a reconstructed PET image are sampling and detector pixel size. Using collimation that partially blocks each crystal reduces the effective crystal size. Using different collimation positions increases sampling. In this study we determine the Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) for a small-animal PET scanner with and without collimation in the transverse direction. We performed simulations of a single-slice small-animal PET system (205 mm diameter and 2 ? 2 ? 10 mm3 LYSO crystals). The septa forming the collimation were 1 ? 2 ? 10 mm3 tungsten pieces covering half of each crystal transaxially. Phantoms (25 mm diameter) with one cold and three hot lesions with diameter D (D = 0.5, 1, 2, 3 mm) were simulated with two S:B ratios (4:1, 6:1). CRC = (S/B-1)/(T-1) where S and B are mean lesion (hot or cold) and background count densities, and T is true uptake ratio. CRC was measured from reconstructions to quantify the impact of the resolution improvement. Results show collimation improves mean CRC compared to non-collimated PET. For 1 mm hot lesions (4:1), scanned for the same duration, the collimated mean hot lesion CRC values (STD) were 0.44 (0.03) (center) and 0.24 (0.02) (off-center), where STD is the standard deviation of measured CRCs of an ensemble of images. Non-collimated results were 0.31 (0.01) and 0.18 (0.01), respectively. Although the total number of coincidences for the same scan time is fewer by about a factor of 4 in the collimated system, the measured mean CRC is higher. The efficiency loss in collimated PET manifests itself as worse STD in measured CRC and noisier images. When the collimated PET scan time is increased, the STD of measured CRCs improves and reaches that of non-collimated PET. In certain imaging scenarios, it may be possible to scan longer with a collimated PET system to make up for the efficiency loss. In conclusion, our study shows the use of collimation has the potential to impr- - ove the quantification and detection capabilities of a small-animal PET system.
Keywords :
collimators; image reconstruction; image resolution; medical image processing; phantoms; positron emission tomography; Geant4; background count densities; cold lesions; collimation; contrast recovery coefficient; detector pixel size; hot lesions; image reconstruction; image resolution; mean lesion; phantoms; sampling; single-slice small-animal PET scanner; size 0.5 mm; size 1 mm; size 2 mm; size 205 mm; size 25 mm; size 3 mm; uptake ratio; Collimators; Cyclic redundancy check; Detectors; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Image sampling; Lesions; Positron emission tomography; Spatial resolution; Time measurement;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 2009 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Orlando, FL
ISSN :
1095-7863
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-3961-4
Electronic_ISBN :
1095-7863
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5401626
Filename :
5401626
Link To Document :
بازگشت