DocumentCode
3327806
Title
Initial investigation of single-scan FDG+FLT PET tumor imaging techniques
Author
Kadrmas, Dan J. ; Oktay, M. Bugrahan
Author_Institution
Huntsman Cancer Inst., Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
23-29 Oct. 2011
Firstpage
3112
Lastpage
3115
Abstract
Rapid multi-tracer PET aims to image two or more tracers in a single scan, thereby characterizing multiple aspects of function. Using dynamic imaging with tracers staggered in time, constraints on the kinetic behavior of each tracer can be applied to predict the makeup of the multi-tracer PET signal. Signal-separation algorithms can then be applied to recover estimates of each individual tracer. The effectiveness of the approach depends critically upon the tracers used, their kinetic behavior, the injection timing, and dynamic scanning protocol. A key question is what imaging endpoints (e.g. static images, SUVs, kinetic macroparameters or individual rate parameters) can be reliably recovered for each tracer. The ability to rapidly and reliably image both 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) is of great interest, as characterization of tumor metabolism and proliferative activity provides complementary and relevant information for oncologic treatment decisions. However, it also provides one of the most challenging signal-separation problems for single-scan multi-tracer PET-since both tracers are labeled with relatively long-lived 18F, differences in radioactive decay cannot be utilized to aid in the multi-tracer signal-separation process. This work presents initial investigations into rapid dual-tracer FDG+FLT tumor imaging, characterizing the feasibility and main technological limitations of the approach. Simulation studies show that longer injection delays provided better signal-separation of the single-tracer measures, and markedly better performance was observed when FLT was administered first. Injection delays of approx. 30min led to good recovery (R>;0.93) of SUVs, Knet, and K1; however, recovery of higher-order rate parameters (k2, k3) was poor (R=0.5-0.6 at 30min delay), indicating that information regarding those parameters was effectively lost by the rapid- dual-tracer technique.
Keywords
fluorine compounds; medical image processing; positron emission tomography; protocols; radioactive tracers; source separation; tumours; 18F- fluorothymidine; 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; SUV; dynamic scanning protocol; dynamic tracer imaging; higher-order rate parameters; imaging endpoints; individual rate parameters; injection timing; kinetic macroparameters; oncologic treatment decisions; proliferative activity; radioactive decay; rapid dual-tracer technique; rapid multitracer PET; signal-separation algorithms; single-scan FDG-FLT PET tumor imaging techniques; static images; tumor metabolism; Biomedical imaging; Copper; Reliability; Tumors;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2011 IEEE
Conference_Location
Valencia
ISSN
1082-3654
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-0118-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6152565
Filename
6152565
Link To Document