• DocumentCode
    3350385
  • Title

    Comparison of bouncing loads provided by three different human structure interaction models

  • Author

    Yang, Yu

  • Author_Institution
    Civil Eng. Dept., Zhejiang Sci-Tech Univ., Hangzhou, China
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    26-28 June 2010
  • Firstpage
    804
  • Lastpage
    807
  • Abstract
    Bouncing is a typical activity of human body and it can generate dynamic loading which should be considered in various occasions. Three different bouncing load models in literature are compared in this paper, including the theories developed by E. Duarte and T. Ji in 2009, J. G. Parkhouse and D. J. Ewins in 2006, J. W. Dougill et al. in 2006. Base on the coefficients given in literature, the comparison focuses on the differences of DLFs (Dynamic Load Factors), phase lags and the combination effects. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are analyzed and the suggestion for appropriate use in practice is also given.
  • Keywords
    human factors; structural engineering; bouncing loads; dynamic loading; human structure interaction models; Analytical models; Biological system modeling; Buildings; Concrete; Equations; Force measurement; Humans; Laboratories; Load modeling; Transducers; bouncing loads; dynamic load factors; human structure interaction; phase lags;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (MACE), 2010 International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Wuhan
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-7737-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/MACE.2010.5535671
  • Filename
    5535671